Strategic ambiguity? The US, Taiwan and China -- a guide by AFP Staff Writers Taipei (AFP) May 24, 2022 President Joe Biden's repeated statements that Washington would defend Taiwan in the event of an invasion has provoked Beijing's ire -- and brought confusion to a US foreign policy stance deliberately designed to be ambiguous. Here is a recap of why relations between the US, China and Taiwan are so delicate: - Bitter history - The deep rift between Beijing and Taiwan dates back to China's civil war, which erupted in 1927 and pitted forces aligned with the Communist Party of China against the Nationalist Kuomintang (KMT) army. Eventually defeated by Mao Zedong's communists, KMT chief Chiang Kai-shek fled to Taiwan, which was still under his control. From there, Chiang continued to claim the entirety of China -- just as the mainland claimed Taiwan as part of its territory to be re-taken one day. Taiwan's official name remains the Republic of China, while the mainland is the People's Republic of China. For years both sides still formally claimed to represent all of China, although that landscape has changed in recent decades. Since the late 1990s, Taiwan has transformed from an autocracy into a vibrant democracy and a distinct Taiwanese identity has emerged. The current ruling party, led by President Tsai Ing-wen, regards Taiwan as a sovereign nation, not part of China. - Strategic ambiguity - Washington cut formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, switching recognition to Beijing as the sole representative of China, with the mainland becoming a major trading partner. But at the same time the United States maintained a decisive, if at times delicate, role in supporting Taiwan. Under a law passed by Congress, the United States is required to sell Taiwan military supplies to ensure its self-defence against Beijing's vastly larger armed forces. But it has kept a "strategic ambiguity" on whether it would actually intervene militarily, a policy designed both to ward off a Chinese invasion and discourage Taiwan from ever formally declaring independence. There is now growing bipartisan discussion in Washington over whether a switch to "strategic clarity" is preferable given Beijing's increasingly bellicose approach to cross-strait relations. Russia's war on Ukraine has heightened fears that China might one day follow through on threats to annex its smaller neighbour. When Biden was asked in Tokyo on Monday whether the United States would get involved militarily to defend Taiwan, he replied in the affirmative, adding: "That's the commitment we made." But the White House and Pentagon moved quickly afterwards to state that US policy "has not changed" on Taiwan. Biden has made similar remarks before in lower-profile settings, which were also later clarified in the same way. -'One China' policy - US policy on Taiwan has always hinged on diplomatic nuance. In what is termed the "One China policy", Washington recognises Beijing, but only acknowledges the Chinese position that Taiwan is part of China. It leaves it to the two sides to work out a solution, while opposing any use of force to change the status quo. In practice, Taiwan enjoys many of the trappings of a full diplomatic relationship with the United States. While there is no US embassy in Taipei, Washington runs a centre called the American Institute in Taiwan. In the United States, the island's diplomats enjoy the status of other nations' personnel. Only 14 nations, all in the developing world, and the Vatican still recognise Taiwan. Beijing has tried hard to stop any international recognition for the island. It baulks at any use of the word Taiwan, such as when Lithuania allowed Taipei to open a de facto embassy under its own name last year, lest it might lend the island a sense of legitimacy on the global stage. The United States and a growing number of countries have pushed for Taiwan to be included in UN bodies such as the World Health Organization (WHO). Taipei accused Beijing of "bullying" on Monday after the WHO annual assembly refused to discuss admitting Taiwan as an observer, despite support from several countries, after pressure from China.
Biden says US 'strategic ambiguity' policy on Taiwan unchanged Tokyo (AFP) May 24, 2022 President Joe Biden on Tuesday said Washington's "strategic ambiguity" policy for Taiwan remains in place, a day after his comment about readiness to defend the island against a Chinese invasion suggested a change. "No", Biden told reporters in Tokyo when asked if the policy was now dead. "The policy has not changed at all. I stated that when I made my statement yesterday." Biden's latest declaration followed similar insistence from top US officials that a decades-old approach to Taiwan remains ... read more
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |