Non-jury trial ordered for Hong Kong's largest security case by AFP Staff Writers Hong Kong (AFP) Aug 16, 2022 Hong Kong's justice minister has ordered a non-jury trial for the city's largest national security case to date in which dozens of pro-democracy politicians face up to life in prison, according to documents seen by AFP. Trial by jury has been used by Hong Kong's common law legal system for 177 years but legislation imposed by China in 2020 to curb dissent allows cases to be heard by dedicated national security judges. Some 47 defendants including democratically elected lawmakers, unionists and academics have been charged with "conspiracy to subversion" for organising an unofficial primary election among democrats two years ago. An order signed by new Secretary for Justice Paul Lam dated Saturday cited the "involvement of foreign elements" in the case as a reason to depart from the tradition of jury trial. It also cited the "personal safety of jurors and their family members" and a "risk of perverting the course of justice if the trial is conducted with a jury". Instead the trial will be heard by three judges who have been handpicked by the government to try national security cases. The documents seen by AFP showed preparatory hearings for the trial would be conducted before a panel of three judges in an open court in September and November. AFP has asked Hong Kong's Department of Justice for comment. The trial is the second national security case to be handled without a jury in Hong Kong. In the first last year, motorcyclist Tong Ying-kit was sentenced to nine years in jail after losing a judicial challenge against the non-jury arrangement. Trial by jury has been described by the justice department as one of the Hong Kong judiciary's "most important features". But a national security law imposed in 2020 states that a jury can be excluded if there is a need to protect state secrets or the safety of jurors and their families, as well as if "foreign forces" are involved. The 47 defendants in the present case are political figures ranging from modest reformists to radical localists. Their case was first brought to court in March last year when most of the group were denied bail after a marathon four-day hearing before a security magistrate. Journalists have been prevented from reporting on most of the pre-trial hearings.
Chinese court rejects appeal in landmark #MeToo case Beijing (AFP) Aug 10, 2022 A Chinese court rejected an appeal in a landmark sexual harassment case on Wednesday, dealing a blow to the country's fledgling #MeToo movement. Zhou Xiaoxuan stepped forward in 2018 to accuse popular state TV host Zhu Jun of forcibly kissing and groping her during her 2014 internship at the broadcaster. Her case inspired many others to share their experiences of sexual assault publicly and sparked a social media storm. But a court ruled last year that there was not enough evidence to prove ... read more
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |