'Malign influence': China's cultural institutes under growing scrutiny By Benoit TOUSSAINT Paris (AFP) Oct 7, 2022 Accused of peddling propaganda and even spying, Chinese cultural institutes are facing increasing resistance around the world, forcing some to close down and Beijing to make changes to their management. China has set up hundreds of Confucius Institutes -- named after the ancient Chinese philosopher -- in more than 150 countries in less than two decades, according to the body that oversees them. President Xi Jinping has called them "a symbol of China's unremitting efforts for world peace and international cooperation", and his administration has marked their "optimisation" and further promotion as an important plank of its education policy. Presented as China's answer to organisations such as Germany's Goethe-Institut or the British Council, they offer language lessons and cultural exchange programmes. Unlike most of their Western counterparts, they often sit within universities. But as relations with China have deteriorated and Xi has taken a more aggressive foreign policy approach, an increasing number of critics in the West say the institutes have become a threat. In June, Germany's Education Minister Bettina Stark-Watzinger warned the language centres were being "used by the Communist Party for political ends". "If I were a university dean, I wouldn't have a Confucius Institute," she said. The German interior ministry said any cooperation between German universities and Confucius Institutes was "extremely critical security-wise" and risked "insidiously restricting academic freedom". Dozens of Confucius Institutes have closed down in the United States, Sweden, France, Australia and Canada in recent years, following similar accusations. "Chinese efforts have come up against increasing opposition that has halted -- or at least slowed down -- the establishment of new institutes," French research institute IRSEM said last year. - 'Veto power' - The first Confucius Institute opened in South Korea in 2004, and there are now around 550 across the globe. Beijing provides teachers, teaching materials and generous financing, as well as scholarships for the best students to study at Chinese universities. Critics say institute teachers come under pressure to spread a censored or distorted version of China's recent history, with discussions strongly discouraged on subjects such as human rights, the treatment of the Muslim Uyghur people, and the status of Taiwan. The US-based National Association of Scholars (NAS) said in a June report it had found evidence of some universities signing secret contracts with the Chinese government, granting the authority that oversaw the institutes the "power to hire teachers, select curricula, and exercise veto power over all Confucius Institute programmes and events". In France, that authority, called Hanban, began demanding one such institute be integrated into the University of Lyon, suspending an annual subsidy without warning, according to Australian academic Clive Hamilton. When French educators refused to comply, denouncing "the meddling of a Chinese state-linked structure" in university affairs, the institute closed down in 2013. In the United States, of 118 Confucius Institutes, 104 have closed or are in the process of doing so, the NAS says. In 2020, Washington designated the US headquarters of the Chinese educational organisation as a "diplomatic mission" in a bid to hold it to better account. The US State Department described it as "an entity advancing Beijing's global propaganda and malign influence campaign on US campuses" and in school classrooms. - 'Cosmetic' changes - In response, Beijing scrapped Hanban, instead creating a Centre for Chinese Language Education and Cooperation. A non-governmental foundation was set up to oversee the work of the institutes. The move was intended to dispel "the Western misinterpretation that the organisation served as China's ideological marketing machine", an article at the time in the Chinese state-run tabloid Global Times quoted analysts as saying. But Matej Simalcik, of the Central European Institute of Asian Studies in Slovakia, said these changes were merely "cosmetic". "The Chinese government is responding... but not in a way that they would make sure that Confucius Institutes are able to operate independently and not be used for political purposes," he said. Confucius Institutes are not on the decline everywhere though. In African countries where China has increased its sway in recent years by investing in infrastructure and mining, for example, they are still going strong. In late 2021, there were 61 institutes and 48 "Confucius classrooms" for school-age pupils on the continent, according to the body that oversees them. French senator Andre Gattolin, who wrote a report on the issue, said the institutes were also seeking to attach themselves to different organisations "to generate economic influence". We are seeing a "change of direction towards port areas, military and technology research centres, and business schools", he told AFP. Mollie Saltskog, of the Soufan Group think tank, said governments outside China needed to better fund Chinese language courses. "Governments should work to increase the funding for Chinese-language and educational programmes... to minimise the appeal to take money from Beijing-backed sources," she told AFP. "China is a very important country... and we should encourage those interested in learning more about it, without sacrificing our values."
'Nobody dares speak out': Exiled Chinese writer decries censorship Melbourne (AFP) Oct 7, 2022 Murong Xuecun was one of the brightest stars of China's literary scene, his novels offering searing critiques of contemporary social issues that few other writers dared to imitate. But after a decade of diminishing freedom of speech under President Xi Jinping, he could not publish in his own country and was eventually forced into exile. His fate mirrors that of many liberal Chinese intellectuals who tried to shine a light on the system and then fled abroad, were imprisoned or fell silent. ... read more
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |