Australia rejects Chinese claim reporters evaded the law by Staff Writers Sydney (AFP) Sept 11, 2020 Australia on Friday denied obstructing a probe into two journalists who fled China under consular protection this week, saying its diplomats behaved appropriately. Responding to Beijing's claims that the Australian diplomats helped Bill Birtles and Mike Smith "evade China's investigation", a top minister pointed out that China had agreed to a deal allowing their departure. Birtles, a correspondent for national broadcaster ABC, and Smith who worked for the Australian Financial Review, sought refuge in Australian diplomatic missions after being told by police they were wanted for questioning. The pair left China earlier this week after an agreement was struck between Beijing and Canberra to have them questioned by police before leaving. "What our embassy officials did was provide appropriate protection to those two journalists, ensuring they could safely leave China," Trade Minister Simon Birmingham said. China's foreign ministry on Thursday claimed Australia's actions went "well beyond consular protection", and said it had interfered in "China's internal affairs and judicial sovereignty". Birmingham insisted that Australia had engaged "appropriately" with Chinese authorities to negotiate a deal that "was respectful of China's processes but protected the safety of these two Australian journalists". The duo's dramatic flight was the latest flare-up in a protracted squabble between China and Australia over trade, security and responsibility for the coronavirus pandemic. Both men had been questioned about another Australian citizen, Cheng Lei, who worked as an anchor for Chinese state TV and was detained on unspecified "national security" grounds for nearly a month.
China accuses Australia of helping reporters 'evade' investigation Two correspondents working for Australian media, Bill Birtles and Michael Smith, were hustled out of China overnight on Monday under diplomatic protection fearing arrest. Their dramatic flight from China was the latest flare up of a protracted squabble between the two countries over trade, security and responsibility for the coronavirus. Both men had been quizzed about another Australian citizen -- Cheng Lei, who worked as an anchor for Chinese state TV -- detained under mysterious "national security" grounds for nearly a month. A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman accused the Australian Embassy in China on Thursday of helping Birtles and Smith leave the country and "evade China's investigation". "These actions go well beyond consular protection," he said, adding they instead interfere in "China's internal affairs and judicial sovereignty." The spokesman said Australian outrage at the treatment of the journalists was an example of a "baffling superiority complex". Citing June 26 raids on the homes of four Chinese state media reporters posted Down Under by Australian intelligence officers, the spokesman said Canberra was guilty of "sheer hypocrisy". "Australia says its questioning of the Chinese journalists was in accordance with normal procedures, but says China had engaged in hostage diplomacy," Zhao Lijian told reporters. Neither ASIO, Australia's main intelligence agency, nor Australian Federal Police have confirmed the raids on the four Chinese reporters on June 26. But court documents show intelligence officials did carry out raids elsewhere as part of a probe into covert Chinese influence campaigns in Australia. The apparent tit-for-tat treatment by Beijing has been denounced as a crackdown on foreign media inside China. The Foreign Correspondents' Club of China has warned that foreign journalists "now face the threat of arbitrary detention for simply doing their work". China is Australia's biggest export market, but relations have nosedived in recent months. Beijing was particularly infuriated by Canberra's role in international calls for a probe into the origins of the coronavirus pandemic, which emerged in the Chinese city of Wuhan. China has since imposed tariffs on Australian products from beef to barley.
Hong Kong activist charged under archaic sedition law Hong Kong (AFP) Sept 8, 2020 A prominent Hong Kong democracy activist on Tuesday became the first person to be charged with sedition since the city was returned to Chinese rule as authorities widened their pursuit of critics in the financial hub. Democracy campaigner and radio DJ Tam Tak-chi appeared in court on Tuesday facing five counts of "uttering seditious words" under a rarely used colonial-era law. His prosecution comes just two months after Beijing imposed a separate national security law on Hong Kong to stamp out p ... read more
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |