China News  
Analysis: China's ability on Taiwan island

Taiwan leader dismisses China peace overture
Taiwan President Chen Shui-bian dismissed an offer of a peace treaty with China in an interview published Friday, saying it would be like agreeing to "a treaty of surrender." Speaking to the International Herald Tribune, Chen said China's offer, made by President Hu Jintao in a keynote speech earlier this week, was couched in terms that made it unacceptable. "It is very clear now that if we were to sign such a peace treaty under the framework of the 'one China' principle, then I think this would mean, for the 23 million people of Taiwan, a treaty of surrender," Chen said.

Hu made what he called the "solemn appeal" at the opening of the Communist Party's five-yearly Congress in Beijing on Monday, but insisted independence for the island would never be tolerated. Taiwan and China split in 1949 after a civil war, and while the island has since governed itself, Beijing considers it part of its own territory awaiting reunification. "On the basis of the one-China principle, let us discuss a formal end to the state of hostility between the two sides, reach a peace agreement, construct a framework for peaceful development of cross-strait relations and thus usher in a new phase of peaceful development," Hu said Monday. Chen retorted to the newspaper that Taiwan "is an independent, sovereign country; Taiwan is not part of China, nor is Taiwan a local government of the People's Republic of China."

He was also scathing about Hu. "Hu is a formidable rival, sharp yet merciless," Chen said. "He is like a smiling tiger, hiding a dagger in a smile, with honey in his mouth but a sword at his stomach." But the Taiwan leader stressed that he did not oppose the idea of a peace treaty altogether. "None of us opposes the idea of signing a peace treaty, but everybody has different preconditions and different conditions of accepting this proposal," Chen said in the interview without elaborating. He had said Tuesday, in a first reaction to Hu's offer, that he would only sign a peace deal if Beijing abandoned the "one-China" principle, scrapped its anti-secession law authorising the use of force against Taiwan, and withdrew nearly 1,000 missiles targeting the island. Tensions have risen across the Taiwan Strait amid efforts by the island to join the United Nations.

Its latest attempt last month was beaten off by China but the pro-independence Chen has vowed to press ahead with a referendum next year on launching a fresh bid using the name Taiwan. Taiwan, under its official name the Republic of China, lost its UN seat to China in 1971. The referendum proposal has been strongly criticised both by China and the United States, which fears it will only aggravate tensions.

by Andrei Chang
Hong Kong (UPI) Oct 19, 2007
Although there is little possibility that a real armed confrontation would break out in the Taiwan Strait, China's verbal threats and combat preparations indicate that the People's Liberation Army is preparing to take control of Taiwan's offshore islands should an emergency arise. Judging from advances in China's combat equipment, the PLA's capability to attack the offshore islands is in fact growing much stronger.

Sources in Chinese military circles claim that during the 1996 Taiwan Strait crisis, when China shot missiles over the island to send a warning ahead of presidential elections, China had also formulated a plan to take over one of the small islands of Jinmen or Matsu. The Taiwan Strait confrontation that took place in 1958 had involved mainly these offshore islands, but the battles there affected the overall situation in the strait.

As a deterrence strategy, the Chinese forces now seem to be focusing on taking control of the Penghu Islands. For this purpose China has developed a new generation of large long-range landing equipment, including its own versions of expeditionary fighting vehicles and heavy hovercraft. The development of a WS multiple-launch rocket system is also obviously targeted at the Penghu Islands.

When the Chinese media discuss issues involving combat operations against Taiwan, they primarily focus on launching an offensive against the Penghu Islands. The official press has described the Penghu Islands as "a natural bridge for attacking a more difficult target." The state press has also reported that the Qing Dynasty united Taiwan by taking over the Penghus first, then forcing Taiwan to surrender. Seizing the Penghu Islands would rip a hole in Taiwan's defenses, the theory goes.

China's military objectives in bombarding Jinmen Island in 1958 were to contain the forces on Taiwan Island and to wipe out those on or near the offshore islands. Nowadays, a bombardment of the small islands could reduce the pressure for a landing operation against Taiwan Island proper. There are few important facilities and only a small population on the offshore islands, making it easier to launch firepower attacks without causing huge personnel casualties on both sides.

Such an action would send political shockwaves to Taiwan Island and could foment change among Taiwan's political factions, however. The 1996 plan to launch an offensive against one of the small Jinmen Islands was supposed to accomplish the same objective.

Militarily, an offensive operation against the Penghu Islands may put the Taiwanese forces stationed in that region in an unfavorable position. First, it would be easier for the Chinese forces to concentrate their firepower, especially artillery firepower, there. Second, the strengths of the forces of the two sides in this region are of a much greater disparity than on Taiwan Island itself. At present, the combat units stationed on the main Penghu Island include the 503rd Armored Brigade, armed with M60A3 main battle tanks, one Marine battalion, the "Tien Gong" ground-to-air missile unit, the 168th Garrison Brigade, and sometimes an IDF Fighter Squadron. The ground force units are equipped with very formidable artillery firepower. They have 155 mm howitzers, different types of mortar guns, M60A3 tanks and 8,000 troops.

In the coming five years the following factors will determine whether Penghu will come under greater threat: First, the range of the PLA forces' artillery firepower can already cover Penghu and the region. The PLA has developed a whole series of long-range artillery systems, including the 180-kilometer and 200-kilometer range WS1B and WS2 multiple-launch rocket systems, which Taiwan has never faced in the past.

In addition, the 100-kilometer range A100 multiple-launch rocket system is already in service in the artillery units of PLA No. 42 Group Army based in Guangdong province, while the WS1B and WS2 are mainly intended for export at the moment. In the air, since H-6H bombers are now armed with YJ-63 cruise missiles, the Chinese air force can implement the combat strategy of launching long-range assaults upon Penghu, particularly upon the positions of the Tien Gong ground-to-air missiles.

Large hovercraft and China's expeditionary fighting vehicles may also enter full service in the combat forces within the coming five years, which will enable them to carry out beyond-vision landing operations. This also means that the EFVs could start launching waves of attacks upon Penghu Island from 40 kilometers away. At such a distance, the Chinese forces would be outside striking range of Taiwan's firepower deployed on the Island, and only Taiwan's tactical air force and missile swift boats would have the capability to attack the Chinese fleets launching standoff landing assaults.

The balance of power between the air forces and missile boat fleets of the two sides is severely tilted in favor of the mainland. The heavy Chinese hovercraft can directly launch cross-water assaults upon Penghu Island.

Once the ground-to-air missiles and air defense firepower on Penghu are attacked and severely damaged by missiles from the air and by the ground-based rockets, the PLA air force's airborne troops will encounter much less difficulty in airdropping onto the island than they would if they attempted to land on Taiwan Island proper. This is why the Taiwanese forces regularly practice anti-airdrop tactics in their annual war games. More critically, once a large-scale fight for the control of Penghu Island breaks out, it is very likely that more forces would have to be dispatched from Taiwan Island to reinforce the Penghu battlefront. That would be what China wants most, as it would give the Chinese forces the opportunity to eliminate the enemy forces on or around the offshore islands and further weaken the overall defense of Taiwan.

Once Penghu is lost, Taiwan Island itself will be in greater danger than ever. The application of modern weapon technologies, especially the application of the Chinese EFVs and heavy hovercraft, can make Penghu Island a critical stepping-stone for the Chinese forces to launch amphibious attacks on the southern part of Taiwan Island.

In the 40 kilometer-per-hour Chinese EFVs it would take less than 60 minutes to cross the Taiwan Strait from Penghu. The shortest distance between Penghu and Taiwan Island is only 50 kilometers, which means Taiwan is within the operational range of the Chinese version EFVs. Moreover, the A-100 multiple-launch rocket guns deployed on Penghu could directly fire at Taiwan Island. The only remaining question would be the weather conditions.

(Andrei Chang is editor in chief of Kanwa Defense Review.)

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
China News from SinoDaily.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Bush Defies China In Very Public Meeting With Dalai Lama
Washington (AFP) Oct 17, 2007
President George W. Bush Wednesday defied China's fury as he became the first US leader to appear in public with the Dalai Lama, and called on Beijing to abandon "religious repression."







  • USS Fort McHenry Mission To Set Tone For US Africa Command
  • Walker's World: Inflating Russian reality
  • Analysis: China's unique assets
  • US reassures Russia on bases, warns over arms sales

  • Walker's World: The world and the dollar
  • Construction Bank chief says US shutting out China banks
  • China's trade surplus scorches into record territory
  • Commentary: New global paradigm

  • Satellites Help Save Lives
  • Vietnam villagers face hunger amid floods
  • 3,000 evacuated after China landslide blocks river
  • ORNL Resilience Plan To Help Tennessee, Mississippi And South Carolina Communities Beat Disaster

  • China Plans Ambitious Space Program Over Decade Ahead
  • China reveals space plans
  • Nation Hopes To Cooperate In Space
  • China To Launch First Moon Orbiter In Late October

  • Seminole Adds 22 MW Of Renewable Capacity To Its Florida Portfolio
  • China rejects Japanese blame over East China Sea talks
  • 100 years later, laundry may be easier but have we saved any time?
  • Control Of Oil Reserves Among Iraq War Goals - Putin

  • After extinction fears, Botswana learns to live with AIDS
  • West Nile Virus Spread Through Nerve Cells Linked To Serious Complication
  • New Model Predicts More Virulent Microbes
  • China denies cover-up of pig disease

  • India's coalition to meet on stalled US nuke deal
  • Belarus To Hold Tender In 2008 To Build Nuclear Power Plant
  • Indian PM still hopeful of nuclear deal with US
  • US nuclear deal on, says India ruling party

  • China coal mine blaze kills three, traps 15
  • China pronounces 172 miners dead in mining disaster
  • Chinese workers rescued after eight days in collapsed tunnel
  • No hope for 181 Chinese miners: official

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement